Explore documented scientific discoveries, original research and new scientific developments. Search the library by topic, category or date.
arXiv:2610.32193v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Users often exhibit changes in interaction behavior before explicitly seeking assistance, enabling systems to anticipate future assistance use. This is especially important in high-stakes environments, where delayed assistance can have operational, financial, or safety consequences.
arXiv AIRead article →arXiv:2610.32181v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to support decisions under incomplete information, where deciding what to look up and when to stop matters as much as the final answer.
arXiv AIRead article →arXiv:2610.32177v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Humans reason about the physical world by flexibly combining different forms of inference as a problem unfolds. Achieving this flexibility is a major open challenge in AI: capabilities often remain separated across specialized models, limiting how they can be composed and jointly adapted to a task.
arXiv AIRead article →arXiv:2610.32127v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Post-training quantization (PTQ) is a key technique for efficiently deploying large language models, as it compresses weights into low-bit representations without retraining. Existing PTQ solvers, including GPTQ, LDLQ, and block coordinate descent, commit each weight block to a single codeword before its neighbors are considered, leaving near-optimal alternatives…
arXiv AIRead article →arXiv:2610.32110v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agents and verifiers often rely on the text a tool prints, and that text can misrepresent what the tool actually did, even when the tool's computation is correct. We saw this happen in a production RAG research system used by the Pilsudski Institute in New York, where tool output formatters misled an agent into giving wrong or incomplete information to users.
arXiv AIRead article →arXiv:2610.32106v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific agents collaborate with researchers whose expertise and preferences differ, but benchmarks usually hold the collaborator fixed. We introduce PersonaScienceBench: 200 tasks from five benchmarks across four scientific domains. Simulated researchers provide context and feedback according to persona profiles, while task objectives and grading remain fixed.
arXiv AIRead article →arXiv:2610.32099v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Fixed source superposition and frequency partitioning constrain how communication content interacts with a probing reference in integrated sensing and communication (ISAC). We learn nonlinear waveform fusion across scales for image transmission and localization of multiple targets in range and angle. Reception uses the information available at each end.
arXiv AIRead article →arXiv:2610.32096v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Diffusion language models (DLMs) support bidirectional denoising and iterative refinement, but generation remains largely controlled by token-level masking schedules. This leaves draft-level refinement implicit and limits explicit control over when to insert missing content, delete redundant spans, revisit uncertain regions, or stop editing.
arXiv AIRead article →arXiv:2610.32087v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Understanding language-agent behaviour requires learning how actions are organised across a trajectory and how this organisation relates to context and outcomes. We propose a general framework that connects data-driven behavioural discovery with analysis and experimental investigation. Categories developed from recorded activity define what is measured.
arXiv AIRead article →arXiv:2610.32069v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can perceive a traffic scene, reason about it, and propose a driving action within a single model. However, existing MLLM-based drivers reason from scratch at each frame and commit to a single explanation, discarding earlier hypotheses about the scene.
arXiv AIRead article →arXiv:2610.32060v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent LLM systems aim to improve reasoning through debate, evidence sharing, and mutual correction, but interaction can also introduce failures that final accuracy alone cannot explain. Agents may converge too early, ignore dissent, suppress correct minority answers, or preserve a wrong framing across rounds.
arXiv AIRead article →arXiv:2610.32057v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present HyScale, a long-context training system for learned sparse attention. Learned sparse attention is a promising architecture for million-token contexts, widely adopted in production since DeepSeek-V3.2. Selection, however, grows into the training bottleneck.
arXiv AIRead article →arXiv:2610.32046v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent \emph{test-time training} (TTT) frameworks have enabled open-weight large language models (LLMs) to outperform inference-only frameworks powered by frontier models on scientific discovery tasks.
arXiv AIRead article →arXiv:2610.32045v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI-for-Science agents are increasingly being used for formulating scientific hypotheses, running autonomous experiments, and interpreting evidence. These agents are constructed by integrating a large language model (LLM) into a domain-specific agent harness, which in turn can improve the LLM's scientific capability and enable the model to orchestrate scientific tools.
arXiv AIRead article →arXiv:2610.32034v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The growing population of orbital debris has intensified interest in active debris removal and on-orbit servicing, for which dual-arm space manipulators offer improved grasping stability and load distribution relative to single-arm systems.
arXiv AIRead article →arXiv:2610.32026v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Conventional neural-network training typically follows a predefined optimization recipe, motivating a LLM agent that monitors training dynamics and adjusts optimizer settings as training progresses, but a fixed agent policy does not accumulate experience across runs.
arXiv AIRead article →arXiv:2610.32024v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Task instructions from users for agents are inherently underspecified, especially regarding safety boundaries--creating behavioral risks. To study these risks, we introduce BARC-Bench, a collection of 110 tasks across nine simulated workspace environments where benign requests leave openings for unsafe actions.
arXiv AIRead article →arXiv:2610.32022v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Intent recognition in human-robot interaction requires agents to resolve ambiguous natural language instructions by inferring the speaker's underlying goals. Research has increasingly focused on two notable paradigms for addressing this task: structured symbolic reasoning and multimodal input enrichment.
arXiv AIRead article →arXiv:2610.31985v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents are increasingly deployed in collaborative settings where they pursue separate tasks while sharing resources and operating under review or oversight processes. Such settings create safety risks not only when agents are malicious, but also when they are simply trying to help.
arXiv AIRead article →arXiv:2610.31972v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating conversational agents that act on live, mutable enterprise data is hard: replayed sessions drift as backend state changes, and a benchmark built today can silently go stale as the data it describes moves on.
arXiv AIRead article →arXiv:2610.31971v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly participate in negotiations on behalf of individuals and organizations, yet they remain vulnerable to manipulation, particularly in repeated multi-party interactions.
arXiv AIRead article →arXiv:2610.31937v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern Large Language Models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to carefully orchestrated multi-turn interactions that progressively bypass safety mechanisms. However, many existing red-teaming approaches rely on heuristics or impose strong assumptions that limit their applicability in fully black box settings.
arXiv AIRead article →arXiv:2610.31918v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Distilling interactive LLM agents requires choosing between teacher-generated demonstrations and student-generated experience, corresponding broadly to off-policy and on-policy distillation.
arXiv AIRead article →arXiv:2610.31916v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A durable agent can resume a consequential action while its authority changes and the action's external outcome remains uncertain. We study execution-time reliability of tool-using AI agents, isolating recovery decisions from language-model behavior.
arXiv AIRead article →