Artificial Intelligence · 2026-10-30

Evaluating Causal Reasoning in LLMs: A Case Study in the Challenges of Procedural Generation

arXiv:2610.38100v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) appear to represent and reason about a large range of phenomena. In particular, recent studies have examined whether LLMs can accurately reason about causation.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE LinkedIn X Facebook

arXiv:2610.38100v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) appear to represent and reason about a large range of phenomena. In particular, recent studies have examined whether LLMs can accurately reason about causation. One of the most commonly used benchmarks for evaluating formal causal reasoning in LLMs is CLadder, a framework for procedural generation of benchmark data sets that was released in 2023. Experiments with CLadder appear to indicate that LLMs can perform formal causal reasoning in a large percentage of generated examples. In this paper, we examine what can be reliably inferred when LLMs perform well on test sets produced by CLadder.

Source and attribution

Original source: arXiv AI ↗

This is an attributed editorial digest. For the complete study and original reporting, follow the source link.

Reader feedback

0 likes · 0 dislikes

Sign in to like or dislike this research.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE LinkedIn X Facebook
← Back to research archive