arXiv:2610.35960v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Purpose: To compare 2D, 2.5D, and 3D residual networks for pulmonary nodule malignancy-risk classification and evaluate momentum-contrast pretraining, mild augmentation, and exclusion of indeterminate ratings. Methods: A retrospectively prepared LIDC-IDRI cohort contained 2,654 nodules labeled benign, indeterminate, or malignant using median radiologist ratings. Patient-disjoint splits comprised 1,876 training, 382 validation, and 396 test nodules. Representations included one axial slice, five neighboring slices, and a local CT volume. Each track evaluated a randomly initialized baseline, momentum-contrast pretraining followed by fine-tuning, and supervised training with mild augmentation. Checkpoints were selected by validation Macro-F1.
Machine Learning · 2026-10-28
From Slices to Volumes: Comparing 2D, 2.5D, and 3D Residual Networks for Pulmonary Nodule Malignancy-Risk Classification
arXiv:2610.35960v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Purpose: To compare 2D, 2.5D, and 3D residual networks for pulmonary nodule malignancy-risk classification and evaluate momentum-contrast pretraining, mild augmentation, and exclusion of indeterminate ratings. Methods: A retrospectively prepared LIDC-IDRI cohort contained 2,654 nodules labeled benign, indeterminate, or malignant using median radiologist ratings.
Source and attribution
This is an attributed editorial digest. For the complete study and original reporting, follow the source link.
Reader feedback
0 likes · 0 dislikes