arXiv:2611.15073v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Causality-aware scoring is common in multivariate time-series anomaly detection, yet the literature rarely states when it helps. Holding one causality-guided autoencoder (DeCauAE) fixed, we vary graph quality, anomaly type and protocol against ground truth. Graph quality fixes the payoff: on a twenty-variable DAG the gain over a graph-free autoencoder decays as the graph is corrupted. Anomaly type fixes the target: the structural factor lifts window F1 from 0.800 to 0.976 where anomalies break conditional structure, and its advantage vanishes below a break severity s 0.3. Protocol fixes the ranking: point-adjusted F1 lets a random score match the full model, while range-aware VUS separates the autoencoder family from the classical baselines.
Machine Learning · 2026-11-13
When Does Causality Help in Multivariate Time-Series Anomaly Detection?
arXiv:2611.15073v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Causality-aware scoring is common in multivariate time-series anomaly detection, yet the literature rarely states when it helps. Holding one causality-guided autoencoder (DeCauAE) fixed, we vary graph quality, anomaly type and protocol against ground truth.
Source and attribution
This is an attributed editorial digest. For the complete study and original reporting, follow the source link.
Reader feedback
0 likes · 0 dislikes