Artificial Intelligence · 2026-11-11

Seeing Is Not Believing: Counterfactual Lesion Erasure Teaches a Small Medical Vision-Language Agent to Report Only What the Image Shows

arXiv:2611.13006v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Medical vision-language models (VLMs) often report a finding because the question names it; standard benchmarks miss this. From public segmentation datasets we build counterfactual views without manual annotation: the lesion erased by inpainting, a same-shape control edit elsewhere, and unedited lesion-free images.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE LinkedIn X Facebook

arXiv:2611.13006v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Medical vision-language models (VLMs) often report a finding because the question names it; standard benchmarks miss this. From public segmentation datasets we build counterfactual views without manual annotation: the lesion erased by inpainting, a same-shape control edit elsewhere, and unedited lesion-free images. The evidence sensitivity gap (ESG) is the rate of absent-or-refer answers after erasure minus the rate after the control edit; it is zero for a model that ignores the image or reacts to both edits alike. MedScope-4B (Qwen3.5-4B, LoRA, image tools) was trained on label-derived trajectories, selected by a pre-registered rule and tested once against nine frontier and six open VLMs; four pre-registered checks then probed the mechanism.

Source and attribution

Original source: arXiv AI ↗

This is an attributed editorial digest. For the complete study and original reporting, follow the source link.

Reader feedback

0 likes · 0 dislikes

Sign in to like or dislike this research.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE LinkedIn X Facebook
← Back to research archive